Conspiracy Theorists, Bloggers Compared To ISIS During Congressional Hearing
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 04/16/2015 23:00 -0400
Submitted by Paul Joseph Watson via PrisonPlanet.com,
Bloggers, conspiracy theorists and people who challenge establishment narratives on the Internet were all likened to ISIS terrorists during a chilling Congressional hearing which took place yesterday.
The hearing, hosted by the House Foreign Relations Committee, was titled “Confronting Russia’s Weaponization of Information,” and accused Russian state broadcaster RT of weaponizing “conspiracy theories” to spread propaganda.
One of the speakers giving testimony was former RT host Liz Wahl, who made a public spectacle of quitting Russian state media last year in an incident stage-managed by neo-con James Kirchick, himself a former employee of Radio Free Europe – a state media outlet.
Remarking that the Internet provided a platform for “fringe voices and extremists,” Wahl characterized people who challenge establishment narratives as a “cult”. [Are they trying to dimish us you think? ISIS? Boko Haram? Fringe voices and Extremists? Cult? Its free speech, get used to it.... -AK]
“They mobilize and they feel they’re part of some enlightened fight against the establishment….they find a platform to voice their deranged views,” said Wahl.
Referring to comments made in January by US Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) chief Andrew Lack, who characterized RT as a threat on the same level as ISIS and Boko Haram, Wahl said the comparison was justified. [Can you get any funnier than this ridiculousness -AK]
“By using the Internet to mobilize people that feel displaced, that feel like they’ve been on the outskirts of society, and give them a place where they can find a sense of belonging, and maybe make a difference in their own way, and it’s a problem,” she said. [Transparency is a bitch.... -AK]
Wahl went on to bemoan the fact that conspiracy theorists were “shaping the discussion online, on message boards, on Twitter, on social media,” before asserting that the web had become a beacon of “disinformation, false theories, people that are just trying to make a name for themselves, bloggers or whatever, that have absolutely no accountability for the truth, that are able to rile up a mass amount of people online.”
Committee Chairman Ed Royce then proceeded to accuse people on YouTube of using “raw violence” to advance conspiracy theories. [HUH??? LIKE THAT WOULDN"T GET BANNED FROM YOUTUBE IN A HEARTBEAT? GIVE ME A BREAK! The video above implies the 4 billion Youtube hits were for violence videos...LIES!!! -AK]
Peter Pomerantsev, of the London-based Legatum Institute, followed up by claiming that conspiracy theories were no longer “fringe” and were now driving the success of Jean-Marie Le Pen in France, before lamenting the fact that conspiracy theories were challenging the “global order” and threatening to undermine global institutions. [Curious how that was phrased...rather than say conspiracy theories are no longer theories but conspiracy facts, he effectively says "conspiracy theories are no longer marginalized conspiracy theories"... I do love the choice of domain names though! LI DOT COM!!! LOL!! You can't make this stuff up!!! How many congressmen do you think even bothered to Google The Legatum Institute to see that is its a private investment firm headquarted in that bastian of freedom of speech, the UAE? The Legatum Institute was founded no less than by the man who started the Bangladesh Grameen Bank, Grameenphone and consulted to the World Bank, Iqbal Quadir . You think bankers might just be a little upset with the Internet and bloggers right now? -AK]
All three individuals that gave testimony are staunch critics of Russia, leading Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) to wish “we had at least one other person to balance out this in a way that perhaps could’ve compared our system to the Russian system, to find out where that truth is, just how bad that is.”
Beyond the inflammatory rhetoric, the real story revolves around the fact that Washington was caught off guard by the rapid growth of RT, with Hillary Clinton and others having acknowledged the fact that the U.S. is “losing the information war,” which is why they are now desperately trying to denigrate the Russian broadcaster. [If its a war then the only casualties are the govermnet lies... -AK]
Without a doubt, RT puts out pro-Russian propaganda, but it also broadcasts truths about geopolitics and U.S. foreign policy that Americans will never see on mainstream corporate networks, precisely because those networks are also engaged in propaganda. [Yep, yep... RT.COM is not a good source for Russian news or info on the Uktraine...but it does a bang up job the USA... because you don't have to lie about what is going on in the USA, telling the truth about it is enough!!!! -AK]
There’s no mystery behind why RT has become so big – telling the truth is popular – but because Washington finds it impossible to compete on that basis, it has been forced to resort to ad hominem attacks and ludicrous comparisons to ISIS in a desperate bid to level the playing field.
As linguist Noam Chomsky said, “The idea that there should be a network reaching people, which does not repeat the US propaganda system, is intolerable” to the US establishment.